Terry, you should take up learning Esperanto if you haven't already. You might find it very fascinating. It's one of the easiest languages to learn and it allows for very creative ways of expressing things. It's almost like playing with lego - linguistically speaking.
Island Man
JoinedPosts by Island Man
-
4
TALKING NONSENSE by using words attached to nothing
by Terry inespecially in listening to people who "believe" things (spirituality, faith, etc.
) do i hear words being used which are nonsense.. i'm a person who cherishes words in a weird, almost fetishistic way :)i discovered this quite young.
i was drawn to complicated word patterns and liked to repeat them.
-
-
-
69
Funny things to not do at the Memorial
by rebel8 inpull out a can of cheese whiz, top the bread with it, and take a nibble.. .
say really loud...."oh, wow!
jesus' body is really tasty this year!".
-
-
Island Man
You know, rebel8, there are youtube pranksters who are always looking for new prank ideas to film and upload. I'm sure there are some who might be willing to pull off some of the suggestions on this thread. Ever heard about trollstation? If they're willing to do this ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0TPIJVrTjk
... why won't they pay a special visit to a kingdom hall on memorial night?
-
69
Funny things to not do at the Memorial
by rebel8 inpull out a can of cheese whiz, top the bread with it, and take a nibble.. .
say really loud...."oh, wow!
jesus' body is really tasty this year!".
-
-
Island Man
If you're a lady you can wear an orange hat or head band fitted with a tiny hidden light positioned beneath a tuft of cloth vaguely shaped like a tongue of fire. Then when they start passing the emblems you take a bite and immediately activate the light giving the illusion that the tuft of cloth sticking up is like a tongue of fire (holy spirit) like is mentioned in Acts 2. You can even play a hidden sound device that makes a sound like a stiff rushing breeze. -
69
Funny things to not do at the Memorial
by rebel8 inpull out a can of cheese whiz, top the bread with it, and take a nibble.. .
say really loud...."oh, wow!
jesus' body is really tasty this year!".
-
-
Island Man
You should go and partake then after they finish passing the bread and the wine just stand up from your seat and shout loudly for all to hear:
Then walk out."This is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said, He who has exalted his Son above every authority and every governing body; and who is glorified by the giving of honor to him; He who has given his Son as true drink and true bread for life everlasting to all that would drink and eat of him:
'You are not my people! For the reason that you have rejected the leadership and instructions of my Son to follow the leadership and instructions of men - your superfine governing body - I also reject you!' is the utterance of Jehovah. 'And those trembling at my word - those obeying my Son by eating and drinking - you murmur against them in your hearts, saying of such ones: 'Uhh! He is holding to false religious ideas!' 'Uhh! He is emotionally unstable!'
Was it for an elite class that I sent my Beloved One to die, that you people should have the nerve to contradict his instruction by saying that all should not partake? You people are indeed in an elite class for you have exceeded the scribes and pharisees for haughtiness and presumptuousness by overtly rejecting and defying my Son while proudly professing yourselves to be his only true followers!'
'For the reason that you people are rejecting the flesh and blood of my Son his sword and the birds of heaven will feast on your flesh and your blood at My Great Evening Meal to come!' is the utterance of Jehovah."
-
12
PAROUSIA: The Watchtower's IRON BALLOON
by Terry inthe iron balloon: parousia.
“up, up and away in my beautiful.
.balloon,” is the lyric of a popular song from the 60’s.. it captures an emotional exhilaration lifting us from everyday life way up into the sky away from all our cares and woe.. .
-
-
Island Man
Matthew 24:36-40 should actually be, and makes more sense as (I've color coded related portions to show how the thoughts are linked together logically):
"“Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,+ neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.+ 37 For just as the days of Noah were,+ so the presence* of the Son of man will be.+ 38 For as they were in those days before the Flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark,+ 39 and they did not know until the Flood came and swept them all away,+ so the presence of the Son of man will be. 40 Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken along and the other abandoned. 41 Two women will be grinding at the hand mill; one will be taken along and the other abandoned.+ 42 Keep on the watch, therefore, because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming."
The point of comparison Jesus was making between his presence and the days of Noah is that people then did not know in advance when the flood would come, just as people would not know in advance the day of Jesus' presence.
His reference to the people in Noah's day doing everyday activities like marrying, eating, drinking, etc, is a way of emphasizing the unexpected nature of the event - they had no clue what was about to happen as they were caught doing the activities of normal, peaceful, everyday life. He mentions this to impress on his followers mind just how sudden and completely unexpected his presence will be, catching everyone by surprize. He does this by likewise referring to people being out working in the field and grinding at the mill - normal, everyday activities - on the day of his sudden presence. His whole point was to impress upon their minds that sudden and unexpected nature of his presence and thus reinforcing his main theme to keep on the watch because you do not know when he is coming.
Watchtower mistranslates the beginning of verse 39 by rendering it as "they took no note" as if to give the impression that they were not taking note of the sign of Noah's preaching as they were too caught up with everyday life. But's that's not the point Jesus was making. Jesus was simply emphasizing the unexpected nature of his presence to bolster his point about the need to keep on the watch.
-
12
PAROUSIA: The Watchtower's IRON BALLOON
by Terry inthe iron balloon: parousia.
“up, up and away in my beautiful.
.balloon,” is the lyric of a popular song from the 60’s.. it captures an emotional exhilaration lifting us from everyday life way up into the sky away from all our cares and woe.. .
-
-
Island Man
Parousia does indeed mean presence. But in the context that Jesus used it it has the functional equivalent of coming. In Matthew 24 Jesus uses coming and presence interchangeably because he has to first come in order to be present. So to speak of his presence means to also implicitly refer to his coming since he only becomes present as a result of his coming.
Watchtower foolishly wants people to believe that Jesus becomes present before he comes, which is a foolishly illogical concept that can only spring from the mind of false prophet desperate to cover up his false prophecy.
A careful reading of Matthew 24 would reveal that when Jesus said no one knows the day or hour, he was actually speaking of his presence - which is the inevitable result of his final coming (you cannot separate the two like the JWs are attempting to) . Immediately after saying no one knows the day or the hour he starts off with the word "For", which is another way of saying "because" then he speaks of his "presence" being just as what happened in the days of Noah. Thus he was actually saying that the day of his presence would be unknown! He compared this to the people of Noah's day not knowing the day the flood would come and so it caught them by surprize doing everyday activities. Look at the Greek! That's exactly what he was saying! He was saying no one knew but Watchtower mistranslates it as "they took no note".
Then we have 2 Peter 3 where Peter consistently uses "presence" to refer to christ's actual final coming to destroy the wicked world. It is clear from the NT that "presence" of christ does not refer to a century long invisible presence as the JWs claim.
-
20
Had a operation today and was asked about blood transfusions.
by atomant inoperation was successful only minor but some interesting information was revealed to me from the surgeon.l requested that they treat me as if l was a jehovahs witness with regards to blood transfusions.the doctor said well that varies from jw to jw and l asked what do you mean?his response was that in his dealings with jw's was that approx half of witnesses will accept a blood transfusion in life threatening circumstances and sign a form saying so.l was blown away when he told me this.l was curious if others in here have heard similar storys.lt seems to me that many witnesses have weakened their stance on this controversial subject.
-
-
Island Man
As far as I know it's only a conscience matter in that you can take it and they probably won't disfellowship you
Accepting whole blood or what Watchtower labels as its primary fractions is not considered by Watchtower to be a conscience issue. What they label as a matter of conscience is accepting what they label as "secondary fractions" of blood - fractions of fractions.
Also, a person who is found to have unrepentantly accepted blood is disassociated from the congregation. There's practically no difference between that and disfellowshipping. The distinction that Watchtower is attempting to make is purely for technical legal reasons. By way of illustration if we liken being disfellowshipped to being shot by someone; and disassociating to shooting yourself. Then being disassociated by the congregation is like someone putting a gun in your hand and forcibly pointing your hand with the gun at your head and squeezing your trigger finger.
-
38
Proof of any Dragons
by pleaseresearch indoes anybody have any proof of the existence of dragons?.
we read in revelation about satan being the dragon, but aren't dragons mythological creatures?.
-
-
Island Man
[Duplicate post]
-
38
Proof of any Dragons
by pleaseresearch indoes anybody have any proof of the existence of dragons?.
we read in revelation about satan being the dragon, but aren't dragons mythological creatures?.
-
-
Island Man
I think it is biologically possible for a fire breathing creature to exist. This is how it can work: The creature has a special gland that secretes a highly combustible substance that ignites only when exposed to air in the form of a fine mist. So when the creature gets afraid the glands secrete lots of the substance and the creature exhales it violently in a fine spray that ignites outside the creature's body but does not burn the creature.
Alternatively, it could be two different glands that produce two different substances that ignite when mixed together in air. The creature sprays two jets of the substance that converge at a safe distance outside the creature's body.
The creature uses this as a defense mechanism protect its helpless young. It seems impossible for an animal to be able to breathe fire but I think chemistry makes it possible.
-
6
A few questions I need help with please.
by Pallbearer inhowdy folks!.
has that title changed?
if so, what is it now called?
-
-
Island Man
1) The presiding overseer position still exists but it has been renamed as "Coordinator of the Body of elders". Most JWs would just say "Coordinator" for short or pronounce the acronym CoBE.
2) I don't think that Watchtower takes too kindly to any suggestions for improvement or correction from rank and file publishers. But if you insist on having yourself put under scrutiny by the elders in your congregation and getting yourself thought of as being prideful, murmuring, presumptuous, spiritually weak, etc, the address to use is the address of the New York headquarters. You can probably find that address on their website in the Contact us section or on the inside cover of a year book.